Contributory Negligence Per Se

As most of my readers are aware, Alabama is a contributory negligence state. “Contributory negligence is  negligence on the part of the plaintiff that proximately contributed to the alleged injury.”  Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions 30.00.  In suits where contributory negligence is asserted as an affirmative defense, the jury is instructed that “if you are reasonably satisfied from the evidence that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the plaintiff cannot recover for any simple negligence of the defendant.”  APJI 30.02.

In my experience, juries rarely use contributory negligence to bar a plaintiff from recovery, but more often apply a comparative negligence analysis, and will mitigate their verdict with the plaintiff’s own negligence.

Negligence, as well as contributory negligence, is almost always an issue of fact for the jury.  In occasional instances, however, the court is allowed to find that a plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, and take the issue from the jury.

The Alabama Supreme Court recently held that a builder’s reliance on its geotechnical engineer did not amount to contributory negligence as a matter of law, as the geotech, Qore, argued.  In Qore, Inc. v. Bradford Building Co., __ So.2d __ (Ala. June 12, 2009), the Court considered a foundation defect case in which Qore performed construction materials testing (CMT) for the builder, but failed to locate an area on the site, which had been a gasoline station, which contained gas tank pits.  The area was not properly backfilled and compacted, and as a result, the new building’s foundation cracked.

The builder, Bradford, sued Qore and obtained a judgment in the amount of $196,937.  On appeal, Qore argued that Bradford should have known that it had failed to locate the tank pits, and that Bradford’s constructive knowledge amounted to contributory negligence as a matter of law.

To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law, a defendant must demonstrate that the plaintiff put himself at risk of being injured and that the plaintiff had a conscious appreciation of that risk at the moment the incident occurred.  Hannah v. Gregg, Bland & Berry, Inc., 840 So.2d 839, 860-861 (Ala. 2002).

Qore argued that a Bradford employee had observed the improper work, and had testified that “in hindsight,” it had been a mistake to rely on Qore’s testing. The Court held that this evidence did not prove that as a matter of law, Bradford had consciously placed itself at risk of being harmed.

In  a few previous opinions, the Court has determined that a plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.  In Serio v. Merrell, Inc., 941 So.2d 960 (Ala. 2006), the plaintiff stopped her vehicle at a “T” intersection.  Her direction of travel was controlled by a stop sign, and vehicles on the intersecting highway had the right-of-way.  After stopping, the plaintiff looked both ways and proceeded into the intersection, where her vehicle was struck by a gravel truck approaching from her left.  The gravel truck was traveling 60 mph in a 45 mph speed zone.

In affirming summary judgment for the defendant, the Court held:

While the question of contributory negligence is normally one for the jury, if the facts are such that all reasonable people would logically have to reach the conclusion that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent, then contributory negligence may be found as a matter of law.  Merrell made a prima facie showing that Serio was contributorily negligent, entitling it to summary judgment based on that defense, by establishing that she pulled into the path of the large oncoming truck when she could not have failed to see it if she had looked to her left before, or as, she moved forward into the intersection.  Her own testimony established that she consciously appreciated the danger posed by pulling onto a highway on which the vehicles traveling have the right-of-way, without first making sure that no vehicle was approaching too closely.  She admitted that there was no reason she could not have seen the tractor-trailer truck before she pulled out, given the prevailing conditions.  Serio at 964-965.

had observed CDG and Milam improperly backfilling the
tank pits and that Cahoon testified that, “in hindsight,” it
had been a mistake to trust CDG and Milam to properly compact
the soil in the tank pits and to rely on QORE to verify that
the soil in the tank pits had been suitably compacted.

8 Responses to Contributory Negligence Per Se

  1. although I blow nearly all of my working day on the web learning online games like facebook poker or mafia wars, I always like to put aside some free time to compare a a small number of websites on occasion and I’m seriously happy to report this newest contribution is actually kind of good quality and a great deal improved than 1 / 2 the various other junk I read today , anyways i’m going to enjoy a smattering of rounds of facebook poker

  2. My Bonus says:

    Great write-up, I’m a significant believer in commenting on blogs and forums to assist the blogging site authors know that they have added one thing of value towards world-wide-web!

  3. Poker says:


    […]Contributory Negligence Per Se « Alabama Insurance Defense Report[…]…

  4. This paragraph is really a good one it assists new
    the web visitors, who are wishing for blogging.

  5. Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and
    I was wanting to know your situation; we have created some nice methods and we are looking to swap methods with others,
    why not shoot me an email if interested.

  6. Thanks for the suggestions you have provided here.
    Additionally, I believe there are many factors that keep your auto insurance
    premium straight down. One is, to contemplate buying automobiles
    that are within the good listing of car insurance companies.
    Cars which are expensive are definitely more at risk of being stolen. Aside from that
    insurance coverage is also in line with the value of your
    truck, so the costlier it is, then the higher a premium you pay.

    I have seen that car insurance organizations know the vehicles which are liable to accidents as well as other risks.
    Additionally , they know what type of cars are prone to higher risk as well as
    the higher risk they’ve got the higher the particular premium rate.
    Understanding the uncomplicated basics involving car insurance will help you choose the right form of insurance policy that should take
    care of your needs in case you get involved in any accident.

    Many thanks for sharing the ideas on the blog.
    Thx for your post. I would like to comment that the price of car insurance
    varies from one scheme to another, for the reason that
    there are so many different issues which give rise to the overall cost.
    One example is, the brand name of the car will have an enormous bearing on the charge.
    A reliable outdated family automobile will
    have a more affordable premium compared to a flashy racecar.

    Thanks for the several tips discussed on this blog. I have noticed that many insurance companies offer clients generous discounts if they favor to insure many cars together.
    A significant amount of households possess several motor vehicles
    these days, specifically those with mature teenage children still located at home, as well as the savings on policies might soon mount up.
    So it will pay to look for a great deal.
    One thing I’d really like to say is that car insurance cancellations is a horrible
    experience and if you’re doing the proper things as being a driver you simply will not
    get one. Some people do are sent the notice that they have been officially dropped by
    their own insurance company and many have to scramble to get further insurance after a cancellation. Affordable auto insurance rates are often hard to get from
    a cancellation. Understanding the main reasons regarding auto insurance canceling can help individuals prevent
    losing one of the most vital privileges offered.
    Thanks for the ideas shared through your blog.

  7. Marko says:

    You post very interesting articles here. Your blog deserves much more traffic.

    It can go viral if you give it initial boost, i know very useful service that can help
    you, simply search in google: svetsern traffic tips

  8. You should take part in a contest for one of the best websites on the
    net. I am going to highly recommend this website!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: